REGULATIONS ON THE AUTHORITY OF THE PROSPERITY IN MOTOR VEHICLE PROOF TUCTIONS IN INDONESIA
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
, Yulianor Abdi , Anis Mashdurohatun
Prosecutor, Authority, Auction, Reconstruction.
Crime is an act that can harm the nation and state. This implies the necessity of enforcing criminal law which can recover state losses. This view can be carried out through the auction of evidence which is feared to be easily damaged and reduce its economic value. To do this, the Attorney General's Office is given a mandate by the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Second Amendment to the Attorney General's Regulation Number Per-027/A/Ja/10/2014 concerning Guidelines for Asset Recovery. The position of the prosecutor as the auctioneer of state loot has in its development led to problems due to the lack of authority of the prosecutor in processing motorized vehicle ownership documents which in the end lead to the winning bidder receiving the auctioned goods without ownership documents for said motorized vehicles. The purpose of this study is to find out and find issues related to why regulations related to the authority of prosecutors in the auction of evidence of motorized vehicles have not been able to bring about justice, to find out and find weaknesses in regulations related to the authority of prosecutors in auctions of evidence of motorized vehicles that have not been fair. Based on the research conducted, it is known that the regulation of the attorney's authority in motor vehicle auctions in its development has not been able to achieve justice for the auction winner, this is because the auctioned goods auctioned by the attorney are not equipped with documents proof of vehicle ownership which makes the auction winner unable to process vehicle ownership documents. Weaknesses in the regulation of the prosecutor's authority in motor vehicle auctions consist of a legal vacuum related to the regulation of proof of ownership of motorized vehicles as a result of the prosecutor's auction, weaknesses in the structure of the prosecutor's party are not informative regarding the issue of the existence of motorized vehicle ownership documents on the evidence being auctioned, and cultural weaknesses in the form of there was no attempt by the auction winner to be more observant in examining the ownership status of the motorized vehicle which is evidence being auctioned off by the prosecutor's office.
"REGULATIONS ON THE AUTHORITY OF THE PROSPERITY IN MOTOR VEHICLE PROOF TUCTIONS IN INDONESIA", IJNRD - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (www.IJNRD.org), ISSN:2456-4184, Vol.8, Issue 3, page no.a335-a340, March-2023, Available :https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2303034.pdf
Volume 8
Issue 3,
March-2023
Pages : a335-a340
Paper Reg. ID: IJNRD_188237
Published Paper Id: IJNRD2303034
Downloads: 000118848
Research Area: Social Science and Humanities
Country: Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
ISSN: 2456-4184 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.76 Calculated By Google Scholar | ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.76 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Publisher: IJNRD (IJ Publication) Janvi Wave
